本文从另一个角度考察八股文,认为它的“代圣贤立言”和诗人的“赋诗言志”有共同之处,“赋诗言志要言的是赋诗者的志,而不是诗人的志”,“八股文作者脱离了原来语境,字面意义并未发生改变,但是总体指向发生了变化”,都用典籍的词句的词面意思来作为沟通前人与自己的桥梁,都是借重而又忽略原文的意思来表达自己的意思。 This article examines the eight-part essay from another point of view, believing that it has something in common with the poet’s poetic confession, “It is the poet’s ambition, not the poet’s Chi ”,“ the author of the eight-part essay is out of the original context, the literal meaning has not changed, but the overarching direction has undergone changes ”. All of them use the word meanings of the classics as a bridge to communicate their predecessors and themselves, While ignoring the original meaning to express their own meaning.