论文部分内容阅读
司法鉴定意见是司法实践活动当中,法院将特定的专业事项委托给司法鉴定机构进行鉴定的书面证据,其具有其他一般证据客观性、合法性和关联性的特征。但是,由于司法鉴定过程严重依赖于司法鉴定人员个人,专业知识掌握程度的不同,个人社会阅历的差异,导致鉴定意见不可避免的具有一定的瑕疵。而质证作为法院庭审的重要环节,是当事人诉讼权利得以保障及司法公正得以实现的重要手段。本文以对司法鉴定意见的性质分析及其质证程序的现状陈述为铺垫,对我国建立及完善鉴定人出庭作证制度的建立提出了一些初步设想。
The opinions of forensic appraisals are the written evidence that the court delegates specific professional matters to the forensic body for judicial appraisal activities, which has the characteristics of other general objectivity, legality and relevance. However, due to the fact that the process of forensic examination is heavily dependent on individual forensic personnel, the different levels of mastery of professional knowledge and the differences in personal social experiences, the identification opinions inevitably have certain flaws. As an important part of court trial, cross-examination is an important means by which litigant’s litigation right can be protected and judicial fair can be realized. Based on the analysis of the nature of forensic opinions and the present situation of its testimony procedure, this article puts forward some tentative ideas for establishing and perfecting the system of witness testifying in court.