论文部分内容阅读
目的比较血液透析和腹膜透析患者的生活质量的差异,探讨适合慢性肾衰竭患者的透析方式。方法选择2008年1月-2010年1月在某中心医院规律血液透析患者32例,规律腹膜透析患者36例。所有患者均检测生化指标,并行健康生活质量SF-36问卷调查。结果两组患者MAP、血肌酐、血白蛋白、血红蛋白、Ca、P、iPTH、等临床参数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腹膜透析组的躯体疼痛、情感职能要优于血液透析组,血液透析组的生命活力要明显优于腹膜透析组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹膜透析患者生活质量好于血液透析患者生活质量。
Objective To compare the differences of quality of life between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients and to explore the dialysis method suitable for patients with chronic renal failure. Methods From January 2008 to January 2010, 32 patients undergoing regular hemodialysis in a central hospital and 36 patients undergoing regular peritoneal dialysis were selected. All patients were tested biochemical indicators, parallel to the quality of life of the SF-36 questionnaire. Results The clinical parameters of MAP, serum creatinine, serum albumin, hemoglobin, Ca, P and iPTH in the two groups had no significant difference (P> 0.05); somatic pain and emotional function in peritoneal dialysis group were better than those in blood The viability of dialysis group and hemodialysis group was significantly better than that of peritoneal dialysis group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The quality of life of peritoneal dialysis patients is better than that of hemodialysis patients.