论文部分内容阅读
“诗 -评”的模式在古代诗话词话里大量存在着 ,如何阐释它们间的关系 ,是我们进一步挖掘古代诗学思想和批评实践经验 ,完成古代诗学现代转化的重要一环。本文以“不著一字 ,尽得风流”诗评话语为个案 ,通过王士祯评李白、孟浩然的诗与评的还原分析 ,指出了王士祯的评论存在着一定的不当之处 ,它混淆了“言外之意”与“不著一字 ,尽得风流”所体现的“妙味意”之间的差别。论文中所运用“诗 -评”关系和诗论家的“诗论意图”的还原阐释方法 ,相信对整个古代诗话、词话研究都具有方法论借鉴意义。
The pattern of “poetry-commentary” exists in a great quantity in the ancient poetry and calligraphers. How to interpret the relationship between them is an important part of us in further digging ancient poetics and criticizing practical experience and accomplishing the modern transformation of ancient poetics. This article takes the poem remarks and commentaries of “no word, elegant style” as a case and analyzes the reduction and analysis of the poems and comments by Li Bai and Meng Haoran by Wang Shizhen, pointing out that Wang Shizhen’s comments have certain defects. It confuses “ ”And“ do not have the word, enjoyable, ”embodied by the“ wonderful taste ”difference between. The method of “poetry-commentary” used in the dissertation and the reduction and interpretation method of the poet’s “poetic intention” are believed to have the methodological significance for the whole study of ancient poetry and speech.