论文部分内容阅读
《百家讲坛》作为知识分子与大众文化融合的典型个案,“鸳鸯蝴蝶派”和“百家讲坛”作为两个时期大众文化的代表,都出现在我国社会的重大转型时期,他们所面临的共同境遇都是知识分子边缘化;上个世纪的“鸳鸯蝴蝶派”文学和当下《百家讲坛》的盛行,都以新型大众媒介的兴起为基础;不同的是,《百家讲坛》是在真正意义上的现代传媒发展后出现的,电视声像文化构成了文化消费的主流。《百家讲坛》虽然存在诸多问题,但在文化普及、娱乐大众方面的成就,以及在构建多元文化空间的独特尝试是不可忽视的。我们不妨吸取新文学家们以及百年来文史学家对待“鸳鸯蝴蝶派”的经验和教训,对《百家讲坛》采取包容与理解的态度,更多地提出一些建设性的批评,共同提升大众文化审美底蕴和艺术水准,构建多元互动、和谐共生的公共文化空间。
As a typical case of the fusion of intellectuals and mass culture, “100 forums”, “the school of the ducks and ducks” and “the 100 forums”, as representatives of mass culture in both periods all appeared in a period of major transformation of our society, The common situation they all face is the marginalization of intellectuals. In the last century, the prevalence of “the Mandarin Duck Butterfly School” and the current “hundred forums” are all based on the rise of a new mass media. The difference is that “ The 100 forums emerged after the development of modern media in the true sense. Television audio-visual culture constituted the mainstream of cultural consumption. Although there are many problems in the ”100 forums“, achievements in popularizing culture and entertaining the public, as well as unique attempts to build a multicultural space, can not be ignored. We may as well learn from the experience and lessons learned by the new writers and centuries of historians in handling the ”Yuanyang Hudie“ and adopt an inclusive and understanding attitude toward the ”100 forums," and put forward more constructive criticisms in common Enhance the cultural heritage of the public culture and art standards, and build a multi-interactive, harmonious and symbiotic public cultural space.