论文部分内容阅读
证据问题可以说是现代刑事诉讼制度的的基础和核心,而在所有的证据理论中,证明标准又是一个蕴含着丰富的理论和实践争议的问题。从英美法和大陆法关于刑事证明标准的规定看,证明标准的层次性或差异性主要从诉讼阶段、证明对象、证明主体三个方面得到了体现。通过对两大法系刑事证明标准的分类、理论基础、实践价值等问题进行梳理和分析,比较两者的差异并结合我国的刑事诉讼立法现状,对我国刑事诉讼证明标准提出了一些完善对策。
The issue of evidence can be said to be the basis and core of the modern criminal procedure system. In all the evidence theory, the standard of proof is another issue that contains a wealth of theoretical and practical controversies. From the Anglo-U.S. Law and civil law provisions on criminal proof standards, the level of proof or the difference mainly from the litigation stage, the object of proof, the main proof of the three aspects have been reflected. By combing and analyzing the classification, theoretical basis and practical value of the criminal identification standards in the two legal systems, comparing the differences between the two and combining with the status quo of the criminal procedure legislation in our country, we put forward some countermeasures to the standards of criminal procedure certification in our country.