论文部分内容阅读
选择资料完整诊断可靠的４５岁以上３７８例，分性别、年龄、健康，常见老年病组进行血液流变学和中风预报检查。结果进行对比统计学处理。发现老年前期各老年病组与健康组比较有一部分血流变数值Ｐ＜０．０５；老年组绝大部分数值Ｐ＞０．０５无统计学意义。结果表明随着年龄的增长，血粘度增高，老年组各疾病组与健康组血流变变化无显著性差异。又经一年观察发现脑梗塞的发病与中风预报的“＋”加号多少无关。因此我们认为单用血流变、血脂、年龄来预报中风近期价值不大。
Select the data complete and reliable diagnosis of 378 cases over 45 years of age, sex, age, health, common geriatric disease group hemorheology and stroke forecast. The results were compared with statistical analysis. Found that the elderly pre-senile group and healthy group compared to some blood rheology P <0.05; most of the elderly group P> 0.05 was not statistically significant. The results showed that with age, blood viscosity increased, the elderly group of disease groups and healthy group no significant difference in blood flow changes. After another year of observation found that the incidence of cerebral infarction and stroke forecast “+” plus number has nothing to do. Therefore, we think that the use of blood rheology alone, blood lipids, age to predict the recent value of stroke is not.