尽管我们不容易对记叙体史和分析体史的区别作出适当的解释,但是,这种区别却不能予以忽视。如果我们认为,所有的历史仅仅是用编年形式来叙述历史事件,那么历史学家将会提出异议;另一方面,这至少又使哲学家认为,历史的特征同记叙体有着某种联系。的确,记叙体的概念也许是以对“历史”的传统解释和辞典的释义为其特色。 Although it is not easy to give a proper explanation of the distinction between narratological and analytic histories, this distinction can not be ignored. If, in our opinion, all history is merely a chronological presentation of historical events, then historians will raise objections; at the same time, at a minimum, it will make philosophers think that the characteristics of history have a connection with the narrative. Indeed, the concept of narrative may be based on the traditional interpretation of “history” and the definition of thesaurus.