只有自觉参与经济建设,才能搞好思想政治工作,发挥其应有的作用,已成为广大政工干部的共识。但是,在参与过程中,也不免掺有杂音和“跑调”现象。一种是把“参与”理解为“弃政从经”,认为参与就是参加,参加就得改行,否则就不是“参与”。另一种则把“参与”理解为只能是间接服务,只要管住党员不出事,保住企业不出乱子就行了,否则就是“种别人田,荒自己的地”。这两种观点都具有片面性和局限性。因为:其一,我们说的“参与”是更好地为“中心”服务的。坚持以经济建设为中心,不仅是行政的根本任务,也是企业党组织头等重要的责任,是发挥政治核心作用的本质内容。其二,“参与”是手段,不是目的,目的是通过这一过程了解和掌握经济工作的第一手材料,增强党建 Only by conscientiously participating in economic construction can we do a good job in ideological and political work and give full scope to its due role. This has become the consensus of the vast majority of political and military cadres. However, in the process of participation, it is also inevitably mixed with noise and “run” phenomenon. One is to understand “participation” as “abolishment of political practice”, that participation is participation, participation must be diverted, otherwise it is not “participation.” The other is to “participate in” can only be understood as indirect service, as long as the management of party members do not trouble, keep the business out of chaos on the line, or else is “kind of people field, shortage of their own land.” Both of these views have one-sidedness and limitations. Because: First, what we mean by “participation” is better serving the “center.” To adhere to the economic construction as the central task is not only the fundamental task of administration but also the first and most important responsibility of the party organizations in enterprises. It is the essential content of playing the core role of politics. Second, “participation” is a means, not an end, the purpose of which is to understand and grasp the first-hand materials of economic work through this process and enhance the party building