论文部分内容阅读
成文法适用中的归入判断是指对案件的裁判事实是否能够归属于法律规则、裁判规则的单个、单个或全部要件的判断。归入论证是指提供理由阐明裁判事实是否归入存在模糊语义的法律规则、裁判规则要件的判断的正确性、正当性的思维活动。归入论证的步骤包括:在认定案件事实的过程中,寻找相关法律条文;分解法律规则的要件,必要时可构建裁判规则并分解其要件;识别、提取各个要件事实,分别对要件事实是否归入精确语义要件作出判断;提炼模糊语义要件指向的事实的实质,分别作出模糊归入判断;对整体要件事实进行价值评价,完成归入判断。
The application of statutory law to determine whether the judgment refers to the fact that the case can be attributed to the rules of law, the rules of a single, all or all of the elements of judgment. Argumentative argument is to provide reasons to clarify whether the fact that the referee falls into the fuzzy rules of the law, the judgment of the elements of the rules of the referee, the legitimacy of thinking activities. The steps included in argumentation include: looking for relevant legal provisions in the process of determining the facts of a case; breaking down the elements of legal rules, constructing rules of referees if necessary, and decomposing their elements; identifying and extracting the facts of each element, Into precise semantic elements to make judgments; refining the essence of the fact that fuzzy semantic elements point to, respectively, to make a fuzzy judgment; the value of the overall requirements of the facts, to complete the judgment.