论文部分内容阅读
首先介绍了关于话语意义分类的四种观点:激进最简论的最简命题原则、激进语境论的独立性原则、温和最简论的标准化原则与温和语境论的可及性原则;其次,简述国内外相关实证研究;再次,考察这些原则关于解释意义分类和界定所言方面的局限性;最后,基本赞成温和最简论话语意义分为三个独立的层面即明意、隐意和含意的观点,同时兼顾其它观点的基础上试图修正和补充会话隐意理论。
First of all, it introduces four kinds of views about the classification of discourse meaning: the most radical topic of radical doctrine, the principle of independence of radical contextualism, the principle of standardization of docile temperament and the principle of accessibility of moderate context; , Briefly described the relevant empirical research at home and abroad; again, to examine these principles on the interpretation of the meaning of the classification and definition of the limitations; finally, the basic agree with the most moderate meanings discourse is divided into three separate levels that is clear, And meaning of the point of view, taking into account other views on the basis of trying to amend and supplement the discourse theory of conversation.