提要:建安元年,關於伏完覲見其女伏皇后應當採用何種禮儀,許都“三公八座”在四種初擬意見之中廷議不決,大儒鄭玄讚同第四種折中於君權與父權的意見,衆人皆服,唯邴原獨持異議,通過對《春秋》《孝經》的不同經解,認爲應尊重父權的絶對性。本文隨後梳理了北海邴原的經學特質及其具體駁議鄭玄之方式與層次。但此次争議在漢末三國時代未能有定論。東晉穆帝永和九年,關於褚裒如何覲見其女褚太后,“皇后敬父禮”再次展開。朝廷分爲鄭玄派和邴原派,前後激烈争議數,從經學家之間相對純粹的討論,轉向東晉門閥士族之間的往復博弈。最終“鄭玄派”獲得褚太后的首肯。總之,本文以中古史上兩次“皇后敬父禮”爲核心,力求在經學史和政治史的脈絡中理解這兩次争議。 Abstract: In the first year of Jian’an, what kind of etiquette should be used in seeing Vulcan Queen of V Volkswagen? Xu Du, “Three Kung Fu Eight,” was tentatively dismissed among the four initial proposals. Zu Xuan agreed with the fourth compromise In view of the sovereignty and patriarchy, all people are convinced that only by the original dissent, through the different interpretations of “Spring and Autumn” “filial piety”, that the absolute nature of patriarchy should be respected. This paper then sorts out the characteristics of the Beihai Huangpi and the ways and levels of Zheng Xuan’s specific refutation. However, this controversy failed to reach a conclusion in the period from Han Dynasty to Three Kingdoms. Eastern Jin Mu Mu Yong eighteen years, on how Chu how to see his wife Chu Queen Mother, “Queen Father Father ” again. The court is divided into Zheng Xuan and Jubilee faction, before and after the number of heated controversy, from relatively pure discussion among scholars, turn to the reciprocal game between gatekeepers and clans in the Eastern Jin Dynasty. Finally “Zheng Xuan school ” received the approval of the Queen Mother. In short, this article focuses on the “Father-in-law of the Queen” twice in the history of the Middle Ages, and seeks to understand both disputes in the context of history of learning and political history.