论文部分内容阅读
人身危险性被称为主观主义刑法对刑法的最大的贡献。但是,在现在的刑法教义学中,很难找到人身危险性的体系性论述,人身危险性在现代刑法教义学中到底应当如何定位,是值得我们思考的问题。一、人身危险性的定位在中国刑法学中,率先体系性地论证人身危险性地位的是陈兴良教授的《刑法哲学》。该书指出:人身危险性是刑事责任的根据,是定罪和量刑的根据,是犯罪的二元本质之一。[1]随着中国刑法由刑事责任向责任主义的知识转型[2],犯罪论体系也由耦合的四要件转型为阶层的三要件,人身危险性的定位也需要进一步细化和调整。
Personal danger is said to be the greatest contribution of the subjective law to criminal law. However, it is difficult to find the systematic exposition of personal danger in the current teaching of the criminal law and the question of how to locate the personal danger in the teaching of modern criminal jurisprudence. This is a problem worthy of our consideration. First, the positioning of personal danger In Chinese criminal law, the first systematic demonstration of personal danger is Professor Chen Xingliang’s “Philosophy of Criminal Law.” The book states: Personal danger is the basis for criminal responsibility, conviction and sentencing basis, is one of the dual nature of crime. [1] With the criminal law of China from criminal responsibility to the responsibility of knowledge transformation [2], the crime theory system from the coupling of the four elements into the three elements of the hierarchy, the positioning of personal danger also need to be further refined and adjusted.