论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同频率针对性时机选择按压对心肺复苏抢救成功率的影响。方法回顾性分析该院2009年6月-2010年6月急诊抢救病例156例(对照组)与2013年7月-2014年6月急诊抢救的病例256例(研究组)。2组人工呼吸、电击除颤、药物治疗均按统一标准施行,对照组患者按压频率控制在每分钟80~100次,研究组患者按压频率控制在每分钟100~120次,比较2组患者心肺复苏抢救成功率。结果研究组患者心肺复苏抢救成功率为16.41%(42/256)高于对照组的5.13%(8/156),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对性的时机选择可组合成最佳的抢救方案,治疗效果更为迅速有效,按压频率100~120次/min较按压频率80~100次/min更为有效,可提高心肺复苏成功率,值得在临床抢救心脏呼吸骤停时采用。
Objective To investigate the impact of selective timing with different frequencies on the success rate of resuscitation after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods A retrospective analysis of 156 emergency rescue cases (control group) from June 2009 to June 2010 in the hospital and 256 emergency cases (study group) from July 2013 to June 2014 were performed. 2 groups of artificial respiration, shock defibrillation, drug treatment according to a uniform standard, the control group patients with press frequency control at 80 to 100 times per minute, the study group patients with press frequency control at 100 to 120 times per minute, compared two groups of patients with cardiopulmonary Recovery rescue success rate. Results The success rate of resuscitation after CPR in study group was 16.41% (42/256), which was higher than that in control group (5.13%, 8/156). The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Targeted timing options can be combined into the best rescue program, the treatment effect more quickly and effectively, the press frequency of 100 to 120 beats / min than the press frequency of 80 to 100 beats / min is more effective to improve the success rate of CPR, It is worth using in clinical rescue cardiac arrest.