论文部分内容阅读
民事诉讼中的虚假诉讼行为严重损害了司法权威和司法公信,现行刑法体系内无法实现对虚假诉讼行为的有效制裁,需要将虚假诉讼行为独立入罪,因而对其进行刑法规制意义重大。通过对虚假诉讼罪的修法进程的系统梳理,可以明晰该罪的立法争议问题,有助于探析立法原意和司法适用。虚假诉讼罪限定在民事诉讼领域具有一定合理性,刑事自诉领域的虚假诉讼宜以诬告陷害罪等罪定罪处罚,基于刑事司法资源的有限性,现阶段行政诉讼领域的虚假诉讼不具备犯罪化的空间;“部分篡改型虚假诉讼”中行为人提起民事诉讼具有法律依据,并非无中生有,凭空捏造事实,不能构成虚假诉讼罪;构成虚假诉讼罪主观上无须具备特定主观目的;需要合理处理虚假诉讼罪与其他罪的竞合关系。
False litigation in civil litigation has seriously damaged the judicial authority and judicial credibility. The current criminal law system can not effectively sanction false litigation, and the false litigation needs to be convicted independently. Therefore, it is of great significance to carry out the regulation of criminal law. By systematically combing the process of revision of the crime of false litigation, we can clarify the issue of legislative controversy of the crime and help to analyze the original intent of the legislation and the judicial application. Due to the limited resources of criminal justice, the false litigation in the field of administrative litigation is not criminalized at this stage. At the same time, Space; “partial tampering with a type of fake lawsuit,” the perpetrator filed a civil law with a legal basis, not a mere existence of fictitious facts, can not constitute a crime of fake prosecution; constitutes a fake prosecution subjectively do not have to have a specific subjective purpose; the need to deal with false The Relationship between Litigation and Other Crimes.