论文部分内容阅读
本项研究认为,话语对话性空间的建构策略是衡量话语传播力的重要维度。在此基础上,该研究从定性研究的角度论述了中美官方话语对话性空间建构策略的差异以及造成这一差异的历史文化动因。这种差异具体表现在话语中信息量的不同,信息的强度差异以及对话性的广度的区分,其历史文化动因则来源于中西方修辞辩论传统的分野。
This study argues that the construction strategy of discourse dialogue space is an important dimension to measure the communicative power of discourse. On the basis of this, the study discusses the differences of the constructive strategies of the dialogues between China and the United States from the perspective of qualitative research and the historical and cultural motives for the differences. This discrepancy manifests itself in the differences in the amount of information in discourse, in the intensity of information and in the breadth of dialogue, and its historical and cultural motivation comes from the traditional distinction between rhetoric and rhetoric in China and the West.