论文部分内容阅读
同样是探讨历史的书写问题,中国乾嘉时代的章学诚与当代的新历史主义学者海登.怀特都将目光聚焦于文学和历史的关系上。前者提出以文济史的治史方法,后者构建了一整套后现代历史叙事理论。两者的观点有着相似之处,又有着根植于不同文化、传统与时代背景的根本性差异。文章通过对两种文史观的比较,揭示了它们的异同,并分析其产生差异的原因。
The same is to explore the history of writing problems, Zhang Qian of China’s Qianlong era and contemporary New Historicism scholar Hayden. Wright will focus on the relationship between literature and history. The former proposed a historical approach to the history of the literary economy, which established a set of postmodern historical narrative theories. There are similarities between the two perspectives and the fundamental differences rooted in the backgrounds of different cultures, traditions and times. By comparing the two perspectives of literature and history, the article reveals their similarities and differences and analyzes the reasons for their differences.