论文部分内容阅读
法官的裁判与标准化裁判的区别就在于,法官作为具备专业法律知识与法学素养的主体能够通过其主观能动性来解释法律,运用法学规则来填补法律漏洞,并将其应用于具体的案件裁判当中。行政审判中能否将《行政许可法》所确立的信赖保护原则类推适用于房屋登记类行政案件是值得探讨的问题,鉴于目前我国行政法律体系的不完善性,以类推适用法律的方式无疑能够起到很大的法律漏洞的填补作用。房屋登记属相对法律保留事项,并非如行政处罚讲求的绝对法定性,因此在允许的行政法领域,以类推的方式裁断案件应该得到支持。
The difference between a judge’s referee and a standardized judge lies in that the judge, as a subject with professional legal knowledge and legal literacy, can explain the law through his subjective initiative and use legal rules to fill legal loopholes and apply it to specific case referees. Whether the application of the principle of trust protection established in the Administrative Permission Law to administrative cases of housing registration is an issue to be explored in administrative adjudication. In view of the imperfection of administrative law system in our country, it is doubtless to be able to apply the law by analogy Play a great legal loophole to fill the role. Housing registration is a relative legal reservation, not the absolute statutory nature of the administrative penalties, so in the field of administrative law allowed by analogy to determine the case should be supported.