论文部分内容阅读
[目的/意义]提出三位一体的学科服务模型:普适学科服务和高阶学科服务一体化;学科评价与学科服务一体化;学科服务和资源建设一体化。[方法/过程]根据近10年图书馆学科服务的理论研究,绘制相关知识图谱,得出了一横四纵研究分支。在阐述嵌入式与Lib Guides的基础上,梳理学科服务的实践情况,并对学科服务的业务进行分类,总结出学科服务面临的困境:嵌入式信息素养教育的形式化、文献传递为代表的资源共享模式局限、针对科研的学科服务的浅表化以及学科服务平台建设的误区。[结果/结论]该模型体现了数据无缝链接、替代计量的学科评价方式。
[Purpose / Significance] Put forward the Trinity model of disciplinary services: the integration of universal disciplinary services and higher-level disciplinary services; the integration of subject evaluation and disciplinary services; the integration of disciplinary services and resource construction. [Methods / Processes] According to the theoretical research of library discipline services in the recent 10 years, we draw the relevant knowledge maps and draw a research branch of vertical and horizontal vertical. On the basis of expatiating embeddedness and Lib Guides, combing the practice of subject service and classifying the service of subject service, the difficulties of subject service are summarized: the formalization of embedded information literacy education and the resource represented by document delivery The limitation of sharing mode, the superficialization of the discipline service for scientific research and the misunderstanding of the construction of the discipline service platform. [Results / Conclusions] The model reflects the way in which the data is seamlessly linked and the alternative measurement measures the subject.