论文部分内容阅读
侵犯特定财产权适用精神损害赔偿在理论上具有正当性。大陆法系和英美法系国家对侵犯财产权的精神损害赔偿持普遍限制的态度。在此问题上我国的司法实践做法不一。最高人民法院的司法解释在侵犯财产权精神损害赔偿的问题上有所突破,但存在一定的局限性。应当对客体的判断标准进行重新界定,加入客观性的标准,即社会一般人公认该特定物具有情感寄托意义。
It is theoretically justified to apply the compensation for mental damages for the infringement of specific property rights. Civil law and Anglo-American countries have a generally restrictive attitude toward compensation for moral damages infringing property rights. On this issue, our country’s judicial practice is different. The judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court made a breakthrough on the issue of infringement upon the spiritual damage compensation of property rights, but it has some limitations. The criterion of object judgment should be redefined to include the objectivity standard, that is, the common people in the society recognize that the specific object has the emotional pinpointing significance.