论文部分内容阅读
目的对临床护理路径在医院感染控制中的应用进行分析。方法 61例住院患者作为研究对象,随机分为实验组(31例)和对照组(30例)。实验组给予临床护理路径,对照组给予常规护理,比较分析两组的效果。结果护理后,实验组感染率为16.13%,护理满意度为96.77%,均优于对照组的46.67%、66.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对住院患者临床护理路径进行有效干预,可取得较为理想的效果,值得推广。
Objective To analyze the application of clinical nursing pathway in hospital infection control. Methods Sixty-one inpatients were randomly divided into experimental group (n = 31) and control group (n = 30). The experimental group was given clinical nursing path, while the control group was given routine nursing care. The effects of both groups were compared. Results After treatment, the infection rate in the experimental group was 16.13% and the satisfaction rate in nursing was 96.77%, which were all better than those in the control group (46.67%, 66.67%). The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions The effective intervention of clinical nursing pathway in hospitalized patients can achieve satisfactory results and is worth popularizing.