论文部分内容阅读
商务部“汇源案”运用竞争优势来证实进入障碍和否决并购,但本文证明,抬高进入障碍、降低消费者和社会福利的不是竞争优势,而是交易费用。而且从规制过程的角度考察,反垄断适用竞争优势标准会加剧规制难度,干扰市场正常竞争,而适用交易费用标准可以节约规制成本,且契合反垄断精神。因此,我国反垄断应该弃用竞争优势标准,发展与完善交易费用标准。
MOFCOM “Huiyuan Case” uses competitive advantage to prove entry barriers and rejected mergers and acquisitions. However, this paper demonstrates that it is not a competitive advantage but a transaction cost to elevate barriers to entry and reduce consumer and social benefits. And from the perspective of the regulatory process, the application of antitrust standards of competitive advantage will exacerbate the difficulty of regulation and disrupt the normal market competition. The application of transaction cost standards can save regulatory costs and be compatible with the anti-monopoly spirit. Therefore, China’s antitrust should abandon the competitive advantage standards, development and improvement of transaction costs standards.