论文部分内容阅读
目的了解艾滋病防疫人员心理健康状况及其应付方式,为艾滋病防疫人员心理干预的实施和相关政策的制定提供依据。方法采用症状自评量表(SCL-90)、应付方式问卷对127名艾滋病防疫人员和150名非艾滋病防疫人员,进行问卷调查,将结果进行对照研究并与中国常模做比较。结果艾滋病防疫人员在人际关系、焦虑、抑郁和躯体化因子得分均高于常模(t=0.447、2.315、3.082、0.549;P<0.05或P<0.01),在应付方式求助因子得分上明显低于非艾滋病防疫人员(t=-4.133,P<0.05),成熟型应对方式与人际关系、抑郁、焦虑得分呈负相关(t=0.447、-0.464、-0.457;P<0.05);不成熟型应对方式与躯体化、抑郁、精神病性因子得分呈正相关(t=0.5497、-0.464、0.527;P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论艾滋病防疫人员SCL-90总分、躯体化、人际关系和焦虑显著高于对照组,问题突出。
Objective To understand the mental health of AIDS prevention staff and their coping styles, and to provide the basis for the implementation of psychological intervention and the formulation of relevant policies. Methods A total of 127 HIV / AIDS patients and 150 non-AIDS patients were surveyed using the Symptomatic Self-rating Scale (SCL-90) and Coping Style Questionnaire, and the results were compared with those of Chinese norm. Results The scores of interpersonal relationship, anxiety, depression and somatization factor in AIDS prevention staff were higher than those in the norm (t = 0.447, 2.315, 3.082, 0.549; P <0.05 or P <0.01) For non-AIDS patients (t = -4.133, P <0.05), the coping style was negatively correlated with interpersonal relationship, depression and anxiety (t = 0.447, -0.464, -0.457, P <0.05) Coping style was positively correlated with somatization, depression and psychotic factors (t = 0.5497, -0.464, 0.527; P <0.05 or P <0.01). Conclusion The score of SCL-90, somatization, interpersonal relationship and anxiety in AIDS prevention staff were significantly higher than those in control group, and the problems were prominent.