论文部分内容阅读
[目的]比较不同地区大学生群体症状自评量表(SCL-90)各因子与全国青年组的差异,为促进中国大学生心理健康提供参考。[方法]收集筛选2001—2005年关于不同地区大学生群体的SCL-90研究成果,与常模进行比较,分析年度效应报告质量效应。[结果]不同地区大学生SCL-90的10项研究与全国常模比较的平均效应量值d为0.31;与1986年全国青年组比较,躯体化、焦虑、偏执和精神病性有显著性差异;大学生心理健康躯体化、偏执因子存在显著的性别差异;SCL-90因子得分与发表年度呈负相关。[结论]与1986年青年组相比,躯体化、焦虑、偏执、和精神病性有显著性差异,提示我们在进行大学生心理健康教育的时候应该有所侧重;大学生心理健康躯体化、偏执因子存在显著的性别差异,在进行心理健康教育时要注意性别差异;SCL-90因子得分存在年度效应,得分随发表年代降低,提示大学生心理健康有好转的趋势。
[Objective] To compare the differences of SCL-90 factors with the national youth groups in different regions, and to provide reference for promoting the mental health of Chinese college students. [Method] We collected and screened the SCL-90 research results of college students in different regions from 2001 to 2005, compared with norm and analyzed the quality effect of annual report. [Results] The average effect value d of the 10 studies of SCL-90 among college students in different regions and the national norm was 0.31. There was a significant difference in somatization, anxiety, paranoid and psychosis compared with the national youth group in 1986; There was a significant gender difference in somatization and paranoid factors in mental health. The score of SCL-90 was negatively correlated with the published year. [Conclusion] There was a significant difference in somatization, anxiety, paranoia and psychosis compared with that of the youth group in 1986, which suggests that we should pay more attention to the mental health education of college students. The somatization of psychological health and the paranoid factor Significant gender differences in the mental health education should pay attention to gender differences; SCL-90 factor score there is an annual effect, the score decreased with the publication of the table, suggesting that college students have a better mental health trend.