文学史上称鲁迅最后十年写的杂文比较全面,是有道理的,因为他掌握了马列主义、辩证唯物主义的解剖刀。我们现在有些言论,问题抓得比较准,可惜分析说理时往往缺少一点辩证法,过于绝对化。比如8月26日上海《新民晚报》文化娱乐版上《严格把关》一文,指出某“女子三人组合上台演出时,竟见其中一女手臂刺有纹身,不禁愕然。”问题的提出是对的,可惜下面的分析太绝对。文章说:“稍有见识的人都清楚。纹身一般都出现在反面人物身上,至少正面人物对纹身是不齿的。”在此立论下,似乎一下子将纹身者都推到反面人物之列了。 Literary history, said Lu Xun essay to write the last decade more comprehensive, makes sense, because he mastered Marxism-Leninism, dialectical materialism scalpel. We now have some remarks and the questions are grasped more accurately. Unfortunately, there is often a lack of dialectics in the analysis of reasoning, which is too absolute. For example, on August 26, Shanghai Xinmin Evening News cultural and entertainment version of “strict checks,” a paper that a “three women’s portfolio came on stage, actually saw one of the female arm tattooed, can not help but stunned.” The question is right Unfortunately, the following analysis is too absolute. The article said: “Slightly knowledgeable people are aware that tattoos are generally found on the negatives, and at least the positives are detrimental to the tattoos.” In this argument, it seems as if all the tattoos have been pushed to the wrong side .