两个字完全同音,或者声音十分相近,古音通假的可能性虽然较大,但是仍旧不可以滥用.如果没有任何证据,没有其他例子,古音通假的解释仍然有穿凿附会的危险。例如俞樾解释《诗·魏风·伐檀》:“不稼不穑,胡取禾三百(?)兮”,“不稼不穑,胡取禾三百亿兮”,“不稼不穑,胡取禾三百困兮”,以为“(?)”同“缠”,“亿”同“繶”,“囷”同“稇”,都是“束”的意思.由于他这一 The two words are totally homophonous, or the sounds are quite similar, although the possibility of ancient phonetic passing is greater, but they still can not be abused. Without any evidence and without any other examples, there is still a danger that the ancient phonetic explanation will remain incomplete. Yu Yu, for example, explained that “Poetry Wei Feng Cha Tan”: “No crop does not grow, Hu took Wo three hundred (?) Come,” “ It means that ”(?)“ Is the same as ”entanglement“, ”100 million“ is synonymous with ”繶“, ”囷“ and ”稇." Because of this