合伙做生意的两人对账目清单发生了争执,一方说账目被改动,另一方称账目是真实的。为此,两人“打赌”并签下协议:谁输了,谁给对方5万元名誉赔偿费。当鉴定结果出来后,输了的一方说,这是赌博行为,协议无效。另一方却不买账,两人最终走上公堂。“打赌”协议是否有效?法学界、舆论界多有争议,也难为了审案的法官…… The two partners who dealt in the business had a dispute over the checklist. One side said that the accounts had been changed and the other side said the accounts were real. To this end, the two “bet” and signed an agreement: Who lost, who give each other 50,000 yuan reputation compensation. When the identification results come out, the loser said that this is a gambling act, the agreement is invalid. The other party did not buy it, the two eventually took to court. Is the “betting” agreement valid? There are many controversies in the legal sciences and public opinion circles as well as the judges who tried the case ...