论文部分内容阅读
采用前照应解决(anaphora resolution)与学习探测相结合的实验范式以及移动窗口技术探讨不同认知方式个体的空间情境模型更新能力的差异。实验1发现,场依存性被试在高预见性条件下表现出空间距离效应,低预见性条件下则没有;而场独立性被试刚好相反。实验2通过在关键句中提示路径房间的一个物品深入探讨更新过程中不同认知方式个体更新模式的差异,结果发现,两类被试在低预见性记叙文中都表现出了明显的空间距离效应。这表明,场独立性个体的空间情境模型更新能力高于场依存性个体的更新能力。
The experimental paradigm combining anaphora resolution with learning exploration and the moving window technique were used to explore the differences of spatial context model updating ability among different cognitive styles. Experiment 1 found that the field-dependent subjects showed spatial distance effect under high-predictive conditions and no low-predictive conditions; while the field independence test was just the opposite. In the second experiment, an item in the path room was suggested in the key sentence to explore in depth the differences of the update patterns of individuals with different cognitive styles during the update process. It was found that both types of subjects showed obvious spatial distance effects in low-predictive narratives . This shows that the ability of field independence individuals to update their spatial situation model is higher than that of field dependent individuals.