论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析社区盆腔炎临床对比治疗效果。方法:将我院2010年2月至2010年8月收治的100例盆腔炎患者进行随机分组,分成实验组与对照组,两组各50例患者,其中实验组盆腔炎患者采用抗生素辅助微波的方式进行治疗;对照组中的盆腔炎患者仅采用抗生素进行治疗,并对两组盆腔炎患者的治疗结果进行对比。结果:两组盆腔炎患者中,实验组中治愈患者35例(70%),在临床中总有效率为90%;对照组中治愈患者30例(60%),在临床中总有效率为70%,两组盆腔炎患者对比结果存在明显差异,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论:研究证明,在临床中使用抗生素辅助微波治疗能够有效治疗盆腔炎患者,并且比单纯使用抗生素的治疗效果要好。
Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of pelvic inflammatory disease in community. Methods: 100 patients with pelvic inflammatory disease who were admitted to our hospital from February 2010 to August 2010 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 50 patients in each group. The patients in experimental group were treated with antibiotics-assisted microwave Way treatment; control group of patients with pelvic inflammatory disease treated with antibiotics only, and the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease in patients with two groups were compared. Results: Among the two groups of pelvic inflammatory disease patients, 35 cases (70%) were cured in the experimental group, the total effective rate was 90% in the clinical group; 30 cases (60%) were cured in the control group. The total effective rate in the clinical group was 70%, the two groups of patients with pelvic inflammatory disease there are significant differences in the results, P <0.05, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The study shows that the use of antibiotics in clinical microwave therapy can effectively treat patients with pelvic inflammatory disease, and better than the simple antibiotic treatment.