论文部分内容阅读
社会发展迅速,债的具体情况越来越复杂。依诚信原则所产生的附随义务,保障交易安全和提高效率,帮助合同目的的实现。但是,附随义务在我国理论学界的研究并不充分,我国的相关制度也还没有完善。在司法实践中,附随义务的可诉性以及其责任的承担都尚未有一个标准,大部分都是由法官自由裁量,实践中并没有统一裁判原则。故本文从分析附随义务的理论基础入手,分别讨论不同情况下附随义务的可诉性以及法律责任,不同阶段的附随义务由于其地位功能不同,可诉性也应具体情况而不同,本文具体一一做了相关的探讨。同时,结合司法实践和理论基础,提出了一些对我国附随义务法律制度构建的意见,例如统一附随义务的概念和归责原则,自由裁量与抽象标准相结合,将判例引入司法实践中等。
The rapid social development, the specific circumstances of the debt more and more complex. The accompanying obligations arising from the principle of good faith guarantee the security and efficiency of transactions and help the realization of the purpose of the contract. However, the study of the accompanying obligations in the theoretical circle of our country is not sufficient, and the relevant system in our country is not yet perfect. In judicial practice, there is not yet a standard for the suability of attendant obligations and the burden of responsibility. Most of them are discretionary by judges. There is no principle of referees in practice. Therefore, starting from the analysis of the theoretical basis of the accompanying obligations, this paper discusses the suitability and legal liability of the accompanying obligations in different situations respectively. Because of their different status functions, the litigability of different stages is different according to the specific circumstances. A related discussion. At the same time, some judgments on the construction of the legal system of attendant obligations in our country are put forward based on the judicial practice and the theoretical basis. For example, the conception of the attendant voluntary obligations and the principle of imputation are combined with discretion and abstraction standards to introduce judicial precedent into judicial practice.