论文部分内容阅读
目的:修订应激评价量表(SAM),测试中文版的信效度。方法:用翻译的应激评价量表(SAM)对767名大学生进行测试,另外对166名大学生进行内在-外在心理控制源量表(I-E)、症状自评量表(SCL-90)、正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)的测定。结果:①修订的应激评价量表具有较好的项目区分度;②验证性因素分析显示,根据理论构想的1阶6因素2阶2因素模型拟合良好;③本量表内部一致性系数为0.678,各个分量表的α系数在0.502～0.804之间;④各个维度间的相关系数为0.262～0.743;⑤除个别维度外,应激评价量表(SAM)与内在-外在心理控制源量表(I-E)、症状自评量表(SCL-90)、正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)显著相关。结论:修订的应激评价量表(SAM)的信度和效度指标符合心理测量学的要求,可作为大学生认知评价的测量工具。
Objective: To amend the Stress Rating Scale (SAM) to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version. Methods: A total of 767 undergraduates were tested with translated stress assessment scale (SAM). In addition, 166 undergraduates were assessed with IE, SCL-90, Positive Negative Emotion Scale (PANAS) Determination. Results: (1) The revised stress assessment scale has a good degree of project differentiation; (2) Confirmatory factor analysis shows that the first-order, second-order, second-order, second-order and second-order models fit well according to the theoretical conception; (3) Was 0.678, the alpha coefficients of each subscales ranged from 0.502 to 0.804; ④The correlation coefficients of all dimensions were 0.262 ~ 0.743; ⑤ Except for individual dimensions, stress assessment scale (SAM) and intrinsic-external psychological control source Scale IE, SCL-90, and PANAS were significantly correlated. Conclusion: The reliability and validity of revised stress assessment scale (SAM) are in line with the requirements of psychometrics and can be used as measurement tools for cognitive assessment of college students.