论文部分内容阅读
在日本行政诉讼法中以“法律利益”作为撤销诉讼原告资格的标准,但由于“法律利益”概念的不确定性,在学说及判例中存在着法律上保护利益说与值得保护利益说两种解释方法的对立。为扩大原告资格的范围,并防止法官过度的自由裁量,2004年6月日本《行政事件诉讼法》修改时采用了两种学说的折衷方案,即为“法律利益”标准的判断设置了四项必须考虑的要素,由法官依据该四项考虑要素来判断是否具有“法律利益”。
In the Japanese Administrative Procedure Law, “legal interest ” is taken as the standard of disqualification of plaintiff, but because of the uncertainty of the concept of “legal interest ”, there exists the protection of law in doctrine and jurisprudence which is worth to be protected The opposite of the two methods of explanation of interest. In order to expand the scope of the plaintiff’s qualification and prevent excessive discretion of the judge, Japan adopted the compromise of the two doctrines in the revision of the Administrative Procedure Law of Japan in June 2004, that is, set the judgment for the criterion of “legal interest” The four elements that must be considered are judged by the judge on the basis of the four factors considered to have “legal interest”.