论文部分内容阅读
关于我国证据制度的定名问题,近几年来,我国的诉讼法学界出现了“百家争鸣”的活跃气氛,展开了心平气和的探讨研究。这是一个非常可喜的现象。对这样一个颇具难度的问题,只有让各种见解都充分表达出来,通过互相探讨,互相切磋,取长补短,以求共识,才会得到合理、贴切和科学的解决。
With regard to the naming of the evidence system in our country, in recent years, the active atmosphere of “one hundred schools of thought” has emerged in the litigation jurisprudence of our country, and the calm discussion has been carried out. This is a very welcome phenomenon. To such a difficult question, we can only get a reasonable, appropriate and scientific solution if we fully express all kinds of opinions and explore each other, learn from each other, learn from each other’s strengths and seek common ground through consensus.