论文部分内容阅读
194 0年法国战败 ,军事理论落后是其重要原因之一 ,而祸根在 30年代的军事辩论时就已经种下。 30年代法国军事辩论的主要内容是如何认识坦克集群战争。艾蒂安纳、杜芒克、戴高乐等人根据当时欧洲新的军事思潮 ,主张坦克战 ;反对派昧于历史新趋势 ,简单化地、过分乐观地认为 ,法国已经建立可靠的防线 ,法军已拥有足够的坦克 ,坦克只需掩护步兵 ,而组织坦克部队进攻将是一种冒险 ,敌人即使突破或绕过防线仍旧无法取胜。 194 0年法国的溃败 ,对这场军事辩论做了实际的总结。法国关于坦克集群战争的辩论和它屈服于坦克集群的事实 ,为我们提供了若干颇有价值的启示 :军事理论的辩论一般具有长远意义 ;必须认识传统的力量及其限度 ;军事上的正确判断是打败对手的基本条件之一 ;必须看到军事理论、战争皆和社会生产、国家经济密切相关 ;落后的军事理论与压制先进军事思想的政策 ,势必对国家民族造成不可弥补的损失
One of the important reasons behind the defeat of France and military doctrine in 1940 was that the curse had been planted in the military debates of the 1930s. The main content of the French military debate in the 1930s was how to understand the tank cluster war. Etienne, Dumont and de Gaulle advocated tank battle based on the new military trend of thought of Europe at that time. The opposition was ignorant of the new trend of history, simplistically and overly optimistic that France had established a credible line of defense and that the French Already have enough tanks, the tanks need only cover the infantry, and organizing an attack by a tank unit will be an adventure in which the enemy will not be able to win even if they break through or bypass the line of defense. The defeat of France in 1904 made a practical summary of this military debate. The French debate on the war of tank colonization and its succumbing to the fact that it succumbed to the tank cluster provide us with some valuable revelations: the debate on military theory is generally of long-term significance; the traditional forces and their limits must be known; and the military correct judgment Is one of the basic conditions for defeating an opponent. It must be seen that military theories and wars are closely linked with social production and the national economy. The backward military theory and the policy of suppressing advanced military ideology will inevitably cause irreparable damage to the nation