论文部分内容阅读
鞍山市读者肖明问: 我厂运输处的调度韦某未经领导同意,于1994年7月私自将我厂的一辆货车租借给盖县某渔业服务公司搞运输。我厂有关领导发现后要求韦某将车追回,韦某以车已上路无法联系为由未予追回。承租方租车运输海鲜品,在路经山区途中,汽车出现故障,造成海产品腐烂变质,损失严重。经交通部门查实,汽车故障原因是年久失修。承租方找到我厂要求赔偿他们的损失,我厂以出租车是韦某个人所为为由拒绝赔偿。于是,承租方便诉诸法院,将韦某和我厂列为被告。诉讼中,我厂再次申明汽车出租是韦某个人所为,但一审法院仍然判令我厂承担原告的损失赔偿。请问法院的判决正确吗?
Xiao Ming, Anshan City Reader: We dispatched Mr. Wei, a transporter of our factory, to lease a truck of our factory to a fishing service company in Gaixian without permission of the leaders. After the discovery of the leadership of our factory, we asked Wei to recover the vehicle. Wemou did not recover the reason that the vehicle was unable to connect on the road. Renting and transporting seafood by charterers, on the way of passing the mountain area, the car breaks down, resulting in the spoilage of the seafood and the serious loss. The traffic department verified that the cause of the car malfunction is disrepair. The lessee to find my factory claims for compensation for their loss, I plant to taxi is Wei Mou refused to compensate for the grounds. As a result, leased easy to court, will Wemou and I plant as the defendant. In the lawsuit, the factory once again affirmed that the car rental was done by Wei Mou, but the court of first instance still ordered our factory to bear the damages of the plaintiff. Is the court’s judgment correct?