论文部分内容阅读
【目的】了解医学期刊中专家拒审稿件的发生情况,剖析其原因和规律,以期为减少拒审率寻找有效对策。【方法】选取《中华微生物学和免疫学杂志》2013—2014年两年内的收录稿件为研究对象,统计并分析所有送审稿件中被专家拒审稿件的频次,总结其主要原因,分析医学类期刊审稿专家的审稿习惯并统计拒审发生的周期。【结果】数据分析表明,50%以上的编辑送审行为均存在被拒审的情况;排在前3位的拒审理由为专业不符、判断不明和工作繁忙,超过三分之一的稿件拒审行为集中发生在每年的6~8月份;近半数审稿专家的个人信息填写不完整,给编辑的送审工作带来了不少困难。【结论】医学期刊中审稿专家拒审情况普遍存在。编辑部应面对外审专家不同的拒审原因,提出合理可行的解决方案,采取有效措施促进医学期刊的长远发展。
【Objective】 To understand the situation of experts reviewing manuscripts in medical journals and to analyze the reasons and rules so as to find effective countermeasures for reducing the rate of rejection. 【Methods】 The articles included in the two years from 2013-2014 of the Journal of Microbiology and Immunology were selected as the research objects. The frequency of rejection of manuscripts by experts was statistically analyzed and analyzed. The main causes of the manuscripts were summarized. The medical journals Reviewers ’referees’ habits and statistics on the periods during which refusals occur. 【Results】 The data analysis shows that more than 50% of the editors submit their testimonials to be rejected. The reasons for the rejection of the top three include the discrepancies in professional judgment, unknown judgment and busy work. More than one third of the rejected papers The behavior concentrated in June to August every year; nearly half of the reviewer’s personal information was not filled in completely, which brought a lot of difficulties to the editors. 【Conclusion】 The situation of referees in medical journals is widespread. The editorial department should face the different reasons for rejection of the experts and put forward reasonable and feasible solutions to take effective measures to promote the long-term development of medical journals.