论文部分内容阅读
通过对大学英语精读课的讨论任务设计,对实验组和对照组进行实验研究,比较了不同的准备方式对小组讨论的影响。实验结果发现,“真实交际型”讨论比“背诵交际型(操练型)”口试表现更突出。
Through the discussion task design of College English Intensive Reading Course, the experimental group and the control group were experimentally studied, and the influence of different preparation methods on the group discussion was compared. The experimental results show that the discussion of “real communicative type” is more prominent than that of “reciting communicative type (drilled type)”.