论文部分内容阅读
文章针对一起合同纠纷案进行分析,认为一、刘某雯主张抚养费依据是《资金监管协议书》,不是依据《中华人民共和国婚姻法》(以下简称《婚姻法》)第二十一条,本案属委托合同纠纷;二、刘某雯虽不是《资金监管协议书》的当事人,但她是案涉利益(人民币20万元)享有者,案件处理结果与其有直接利害关系,是适格的原告;三、鉴于《资金监管协议书》属于委托合同,根据《中华人民共和国合同法》(以下简称《合同法》)第四百一十条规定,可以随时解除;况且被告在案件辩论终结前未履行义务,主观上存在一定过错。所以,刘某雯、罗某娜提出解除《资金监管协议书》之请求合理合法。
The article analyzes a case of a contract dispute. According to one analysis, Liu Mouwen argues that the support fee is based on the Agreement on Funds Supervision, not based on Article 21 of the Marriage Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Marriage Law) She is the beneficiary (RMB 200,000) of the case involved, the case has a direct interest in dealing with the matter and is a qualified plaintiff; 3. In view of the fact that the Agreement on Funds Supervision is a commissioned contract, it may be lifted at any time in accordance with the provisions of Article 410 of the Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Contract Law”); furthermore, the defendant fails to perform the dispute before the conclusion of the case debate Obligation, subjective there is a certain fault. Therefore, Liu Mouwen, Luo Mouna proposed to lift the “fund regulatory agreement,” the request is reasonable and legal.