本文立足于语言与历史的双重演化逻辑,系统考察了“工匠”“匠人”精神以及编辑“匠心”的失落与复归,旨在为这些引起广泛关注的议题发掘深层次的理论根基。在词源学/语义学层次上,“工匠”和“编辑”都起源于社会底层的手工技艺性活动,其行业精神和“匠心”天然具足,只是随着社会历史的进展其本真内涵被逐渐淡化、遮蔽,乃至于沦为次要甚或贬义义项,直到德里达的“语言学革命”才为其“正名”;在历史层面上,工匠和编辑活动作为手工业时代的重要代表,伴随着福特主义和商品经济的到来迅速衰落,又伴随着后福特主义的盛行而重新回归,而且后者与理论界所谓的后现代主义、消费社会和“审美资本主义”的来临同步演进。 Based on the dual evolutionary logic of language and history, this paper systematically examines the lost and reversion of the “craftsman ” “craftsman ” spirit and editor “ingenuity ”, aiming at discovering the deep-seated issues Theoretical foundation. At the level of etymology / semantics, both “artisans” and “editors” originate from artisanal activities at the bottom of society. Their industry spirit and “ingenuity” are naturally adequate, but with social and historical The essence of progress is gradually diminished, obscured, and even reduced to minor or even derogatory meaning until Derrida’s “linguistic revolution” is its “proper name”; at the historical level, artisans and editors As an important representative of the handicraft industry, with the rapid decline of the arrival of Fordism and the commodity economy, it came back with the prevalence of post-Fordism. The latter, together with what the theorists call postmodernism, the consumer society and the “aesthetic capital ”The advent of the simultaneous evolution.