论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨团体心理干预对洪灾灾后居民焦虑、抑郁情绪的效果。方法按随机数字表法将364例江西抚州地区洪灾灾后居民随机分为干预组和对照组,每组182例。干预组进行为期1个月的一般性社会支持和团体心理治疗,对照组则仅给予一般性社会支持。以焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量(SDS)表评估疗效。结果干预前,干预组和对照组洪灾灾后居民SAS、SDS评分差异均无统计学意义(t=-0.225,P>0.05;t=-1.795,P>0.05);干预后,干预组灾后居民的SAS、SDS评分低于入组时,差异有统计学意义(t=-14.795,P<0.01;t=-19.600,P<0.01);对照组灾后居民的SAS、SDS评分低于入组时,差异有统计学意义(t=-13.347,P<0.01;t=-11.784,P<0.01);干预组和对照组SAS、SDS评分差异有统计学意义(t=5.063,P<0.01;t=2.764,P<0.01)。结论团体心理干预对洪灾灾后居民焦虑及抑郁情绪的改善有重要作用。
Objective To explore the effect of group psychological intervention on residents’ anxiety and depression after flood disaster. Methods According to the random number table method, 364 residents in Fuzhou area were randomly divided into intervention group and control group with 182 cases in each group. The intervention group conducted general social support and group psychotherapy for one month while the control group only gave general social support. The efficacy was assessed using the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Depression Self-rating Scale (SDS). Results Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the score of SAS and SDS between the intervention group and the control group after flood disaster (t = -0.225, P> 0.05; t = -1.795, P> 0.05) SAS and SDS scores of residents in the control group were lower than those in the control group after SAS and SDS scores were lower than those of the control group (t = -14.795, P <0.01; t = -19.600, P <0.01) (T = -13.347, P <0.01; t = -11.784, P <0.01). The SAS and SDS scores of intervention group and control group were statistically significant (t = 5.063, P <0.01; t = 2.764, P <0.01). Conclusion The group psychological intervention plays an important role in improving the anxiety and depression of residents after floods.