《雨巷》是一篇颇令人费解的诗歌,原因是初进高中的学生对文中特定的意象、情感缺乏认知和共鸣,如果照老办法解剖麻雀、细嚼慢咽的话,则耗时多收效低。怎么办?突然想到韩军老师的“举三反一”说。韩军老师不主张学生对一篇文章条分缕析、细嚼慢咽而达到所谓的深、细、透、全,主张大量阅读,甚至可以是蜻蜓点水、浅尝辄止、不求其解。大量 “Rain Lane” is a rather puzzling poem, because high school students into the text of the specific image of the lack of awareness and resonance of emotion, if the old way to dissect the sparrow, chewing it slowly, then time-consuming More effective low. What to do? Suddenly think of Han Jun teacher “three anti-one ” said. Han Jun teachers do not advocate students to an article bar analysis, chewing slowly to reach the so-called deep, thin, thoroughly, all, advocating a large number of reading, and even can be superficial, try it out, do not ask for solution. A lot