论文部分内容阅读
目的:对钬激光和气压弹道碎石术治疗泌尿系结石的效果进行比较。方法:选取本院泌尿系结石患者96例,随机将其分成观察组与对照组各48例。使用钬激光治疗观察组患者,使用气压弹道碎石术治疗对照组患者。记录分析两组患者单次手术成功率和并发症的发生情况作为技术资料,根据记录结果对比分析两种治疗方法的效果。结果:在手术时间、住院时间、术后血尿持续时间、单次手术成功率、术后1个月结石排尽率、术后并发症发生率等关键技术资料方面观察组要显著优于对照组,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:临床上治疗泌尿系结石时,钬激光碎石术与气压弹道碎石术相比效果更加显著,值得大力推广。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in the treatment of urinary calculi. Methods: A total of 96 patients with urolithiasis were randomly divided into observation group and control group (48 cases each). Patients in the observation group were treated with holmium laser and patients in the control group were treated with pneumatic lithotripsy. Record and analyze the incidence of single operation success rate and complication of two groups of patients as technical data, and compare the effect of the two treatment methods according to the recorded results. Results: The observation group was significantly better than the control group in the key technical data of operation time, hospital stay, postoperative hematuria duration, single operation success rate, postoperative 1 month stone discharge rate, postoperative complication rate and other key technical information , And the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Holmium laser lithotripsy is more effective than pneumatic lithotripsy in the treatment of urinary calculi, which is worth promoting.