论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨聚焦超声治疗慢性宫颈炎的有效性及安全性。方法:将226例慢性宫颈糜烂患者随机分为两组,其中116例行聚焦超声治疗,110例行波姆光治疗。所有患者治疗后2个月随访进行疗效判定,比较两种方法的不良反应及并发症发生情况。结果:聚焦超声及波姆光治疗组的总有效率分别为96.5%及89.1%,治愈率分别为87.1%及72.7%,中、重度宫颈糜烂患者聚焦超声治愈效果明显优于波姆治疗,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后的阴道排液、阴道流血、结痂、瘢痕形成等不良反应相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:聚焦超声治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床疗效显著,不良反应少,尤其适用于中、重度未生育妇女宫颈糜烂的治疗。
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of focused ultrasound in the treatment of chronic cervicitis. Methods: 226 cases of chronic cervical erosion were randomly divided into two groups, of which 116 cases were treated by Focused Ultrasound and 110 cases were treated by POM. All patients were followed up 2 months after treatment to determine the efficacy of adverse reactions and complications compared two methods and complications. Results: The total effective rates of focused ultrasound and PUM were 96.5% and 89.1%, respectively, and the cure rates were 87.1% and 72.7% respectively. The therapeutic effects of focused ultrasound in patients with moderate and severe cervical erosion were significantly better than those treated with bimmerter, Statistical significance (P <0.05). There were significant differences between the two groups in the treatment of vaginal discharge, vaginal bleeding, crusting and scar formation (P <0.05). Conclusion: Focused ultrasound in the treatment of chronic cervicitis has obvious curative effect and few adverse reactions. It is especially suitable for the treatment of cervical erosion in moderate and severe non-fertile women.