论文部分内容阅读
现代意义上的中国古代小说研究已有上百年的历史,经过几代学人的精耕细作,在小说作者、版本考证、文体与类型的探讨、文本的解读、小说史的编纂、小说理论的阐释等方面都取得了令人瞩目的成就。随着新的文献资料的发现,新的理论和方法的引进以及新的科技手段的运用,不但有新的学术领域和问题的出现,已有的学术结论也需要重新审视。本栏目将陆续推出几组论文,对小说观念、小说类型、小说批评、小说创作等问题进行深刻反思和深入探索。王齐洲教授的论文《〈汉书·艺文志〉与〈隋书·经籍志〉小说观念之比较》探讨了中国早期的小说观念,认为《汉志》和《隋志》虽不是文体分类,其中却有文体因子。二志都强调其所著录的小说作品提供了民情风俗和百姓对政教的意见,具有民间性、通俗性、琐碎性特点,但都没有强调故事性和虚构性,与现代小说观念颇有差异。傅承洲教授的《清代才学小说是否构成一个小说类型》对当下流行的才学小说类型概念提出了异议,认为从才学小说概念形成过程和小说类型构成要件的角度考察,《野叟曝言》、《蟫史》、《燕山外史》和《镜花缘》四部小说并不能构成一个小说类型。四部小说从内容到形式均不相同,很难归入一类。炫才是文人创作小说的一种非常普遍的现象,不能成为小说类型的构成要件。几位学者都对古代小说的一些重要问题提出了新的看法,也许并不是定论,但定会对古代小说研究者有所启发,对古代小说与小说批评的研究有所推进。
In the modern sense, the study of Chinese ancient novels has been going on for hundreds of years. After several generations of scholars’ careful and meticulous work, the author has made great achievements in the study of novel authors, textual research, genres and genres, interpretation of texts, compilation of novel history, interpretation of novel theory Have made remarkable achievements in all aspects. With the discovery of new literature and materials, the introduction of new theories and methods, and the application of new scientific and technological means, not only new academic fields and problems have emerged, but also the existing academic conclusions need to be revisited. This column will be rolled out several groups of papers one after another, the novel concept, the type of novel, novel criticism, novel writing and other issues a profound reflection and in-depth exploration. Wang Qizhou’s essay “Comparison of Han Shu Yi Wen Zhi” and “Sui Shu Jing Ji Zhi” Novel Concepts “explores the concept of early Chinese novels and holds that although Han Zhi and Sui Zhi are not stylistic categories, there are Style factor. Both of them emphasize that the novels they have written provide the customs of the people and the opinions of the people on the state and religion. They have the features of nongovernmentality, popularity and triviality. However, they neither emphasize the story and the fictionality, they are quite different from the concepts of the modern novels. Professor Fu Chengzhou’s ”Novels of the Qing Dynasty Fictions Are a Fiction Type“ raised the objections to the current popular concept of genres of novels, that from the perspective of the process of the formation of concept novels and the constitutional elements of novel types, Fiction History ”,“ Yanshanwishi ”and“ Jing Hua Yuan ”four novels can not constitute a novel type. Four novels from content to form are different, it is difficult to fall into the category. Hyun is a very common phenomenon in literary creation novels and can not be a component of novel types. Several scholars have put forward new views on some important issues in ancient novels, and may not be conclusive. However, they will certainly inspire the researchers in ancient novels and push forward the research on ancient novels and novels.