论文部分内容阅读
2015正值国务院《信访条例》颁布施行十周年,全国各地方政府及工作部门认真贯彻与落实《信访条例》,维护了公民权益,加强了政府与群众的紧密联系。然而,随着社会日新月异的变化,信访制度的发展和延续也面临着更多的争议与挑战。因此对中国大陆信访制度与台湾地区陈情制度、香港申诉专员制度、日本苦情处理制度以及西方国家议会监察专员制度作一比较分析,显得尤为重要,通过汲取域外类似制度的经验教训并相互借鉴,化解信访制度的现实困境、探求我国信访制度的治本之策。
2015 coincided with the 10th anniversary of the promulgation and implementation of the “Letter and Visit Regulations” by the State Council. Local governments and work departments across the country conscientiously implemented and implemented the “Regulations on Letters and Visits,” safeguarded citizens’ rights and interests and strengthened the close ties between the government and the masses. However, with the rapid changes in society, the development and continuation of the petition system is also facing more controversy and challenges. Therefore, it is particularly important to make a comparative analysis of the petition system in mainland China with the system of affiliation in Taiwan, the system of the Ombudsman in Hong Kong, the system of dealing with the suffering in Japan and the system of inspectors of the parliaments in the Western countries. By drawing on the experience and lessons from similar systems outside the territory and drawing lessons from each other, Resolving the plight of the petition system to explore China’s petition system of the permanent cure.