论文部分内容阅读
恩格斯在《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》中指出妇女解放依赖于妇女参与公共领域的物质生产以获取经济收入,妇女解放的最终实现则需要等到共产主义社会的来临。西方女权主义者由此批判恩格斯偏重物质生产,贬低人类自身生产的价值。在现代社会,妇女参与物质生产的同时,却又不得不面对肩挑物质生产和人类自身生产双重任务的困境。此困境的缓解,需要在关注物质生产的同时,重视人类自身生产的社会意义并给与相应的价值补偿。
Engels pointed out in “The Origins of Family, Private Ownership and State” that women’s emancipation relies on women’s material participation in the public sphere for economic gain, and the ultimate realization of women’s liberation will have to wait for the advent of communism. Western feminists thus criticized Engels for focusing on material production and belittling the value of mankind’s own production. In modern society, while women are participating in material production, they have yet to face the dilemma of shouldering the dual tasks of material production and human production. The alleviation of this predicament needs to pay attention to the social significance of human production and give the corresponding value compensation while paying attention to material production.