论文部分内容阅读
提起公诉的证明标准,不仅关涉刑事诉讼价值目标之间的平衡,而且反映一国检察制度及其运行的基本特征。对我国提起公诉的证明标准的把握必须考虑我国检察机关的诉讼职能和任务兼顾打击犯罪与保障人权的双重诉讼目的以及诉讼的阶段性要求。我国现行立法将提起公诉的证明标准完全等同于有罪判决的证明标准之规定欠妥,但我国也不应当采用西方国家“更大的可能性”等较低的提起公诉的证明标准,而应采取“检察机关认为根据现有证据足以证明被告人实施了犯罪”这种较高的证明标准。
The standard of proving prosecution not only concerns the balance between the goals of value of criminal procedure, but also reflects the procuratorial system of a country and the basic features of its operation. The prosecution of our country to prove the standard of proof must take into account the prosecution’s litigation functions and tasks to take into account the dual purpose of fighting crime and safeguarding human rights as well as the procedural requirements of litigation. However, our country should not adopt the lower proof standard of prosecutorial prosecution such as “greater possibility” in western countries, and so on. However, our country should not adopt the proof standard of prosecutorial prosecution The higher standard of proof that the procuratorial organ considers it sufficient to prove that the defendant committed the crime on the basis of the available evidence should be taken.