论文部分内容阅读
将心性论认同为一种传统范型 ,从中引导出凝固的结论作为超越性的真理 ,这是思想史研究中出现的一种错位现象 ,它排斥多元主体间的开放性对话 ,必然使思想史研究走向封闭和独断。将心性论看作中国传统文化的惟一精粹是偏狭的 ,必须从总体上考察其关联性 ,以话语分析的方式予以阐明 ,才能对其进行分解和重构。
To recognize the nature of the theory as a traditional paradigm, from which leads to the conclusion of coagulation as transcendental truth, which is a misplaced phenomenon in the history of the study of thought, which excludes open dialogue between multiple subjects, is bound to make the history of ideas Research towards closure and arbitrariness. To regard xinxing theory as the only essence of Chinese traditional culture is the narrow one. We must examine its relevance as a whole and elucidate it in the way of discourse analysis so that it can be decomposed and reconstructed.