论文部分内容阅读
我国立法上广泛存在风险犯罪。风险犯罪的认定依赖于司法解释。我国目前对风险犯罪的司法解释模式,有两种情形。风险犯罪的刑事司法解释在功能上应理解为裁判规范。风险犯罪司法解释在认定风险犯罪中所起的作用,体现为合理限缩风险犯罪的范围。反观当前的风险犯罪司法解释,存在过分注重统一执法尺度、用司法解释判断取代司法判断的问题,司法解释也没有充分发挥在犯罪认定过程中的注意性规定的作用。风险犯罪的认定应当改变司法解释作为风险犯罪司法认定的唯一指导地位。
There are widespread risk crimes in our country’s legislation. The recognition of a criminal offense depends on judicial interpretation. At present, there are two kinds of judicial interpretation modes of risk crimes in our country. The criminal justice interpretation of risk crime should be understood as the criterion of judgment in function. The role played by the judicial interpretation of risky criminality in the determination of risky criminality is reflected in the reasonable limitation and reduction of the scope of risky criminality. On the contrary, the current judicial interpretation of risk crime has the problem of paying too much attention to the standard of uniform law enforcement and replacing the judicial judgment with judicial interpretation, and the judicial interpretation has not given full play to the attention rules in the process of criminal identification. The determination of risk crime should change the judicial interpretation as the only guiding position for the judicial determination of criminal risk.