论文部分内容阅读
行为人实施伤害、强奸等犯罪行为后,利用被害人处于反抗被压制的状态,临时起意使用平和手段取得他人财物的,理论上存在“抢劫罪说”和“盗窃罪说”两种观点。“抢劫罪说”错误理解了抢劫罪的结构,违反罪刑法定原则,应支持“盗窃罪说”。成立抢劫罪,行为人必须以强取财物的意思实施新的暴力、胁迫行为,暴力、胁迫的程度只要能维持先前的压制反抗状态即可。
After the perpetrator commits crimes such as injury and rape, using the victim’s status that the opposition is suppressed and temporarily using the peaceful means to obtain the property of others, there are theoretically two types of “crime of robbery” and “theft of theft” View. “The crime of robbery ” misunderstood the structure of the crime of robbery, violating the statutory principle of crime and punishment, should support “said theft ”. To establish a crime of robbery, the perpetrator must carry out new acts of violence, coercion and violence in the sense of forcing property to be taken as long as the previous suppression and resistance can be maintained.